553 Comments

Thanks for all the feedback everyone! We're in these threads listening, and it helps to hear what you think -- the good and the bad! -- as we keep working hard on the product.

Expand full comment

You’re a great company and what you’ve done so far is incredible. I’m a full time writer thanks to your platform. But what has made you great is you haven’t played the same attention economy games as other platforms. Your core creators are *artists* not simply *content creators*. Artists will jump ship if this place becomes just another heavily metricated, gamified, winner-takes-all space like all of the web 2.0 social media spaces.

Expand full comment

Thanks for the thoughtful feedback. I strongly agree that we don't want to reproduce the attention economy games -- in fact that's why Substack exists in the first place!

Expand full comment

It’s my pleasure. I feel emotionally as well as professionally invested in this company (as it is currently keeping a roof over my head). I’m just some guy without a literature degree, a former NYT byline or other credentials and prior success in writing. As such I feel like I have my ear to the ground on this. If there’s anyway me offering further 2c on any of this would be helpful feel free to get in touch.

Expand full comment

That’s precisely why this is a bad idea! Don’t fix something that isn’t broke!

Expand full comment

As I once read on a mug in a Buddhist gift shop: Don’t just do something, sit there!

Expand full comment

Love it!

Expand full comment

It does have the Twitter blue check mark feel...which seems maybe not ideal? A sort of hierarchical vibe.

Expand full comment

More gamification is how you will end up attracting GenZ talent, not less. The fact remains anything that motivates Creators to focus more and strive is a net positive for the community and Substack's bottom lines. A writer that has invested themselves totally in the pursuit of their craft should have credibility that can be verified visually in under 1 second.

What make Kik fun? It was precisely the gamified interface. Substack needs to be fun, the app needs to be more sticky. If there were rankings per sub-category I'd be thrilled. I don't want just a reader. I want an app that can give me more than just the feeling of a reliance on my readers for my income.

The badges are brilliant, and motivating! We aren't here to debate ideology or please everyone, we are here to support good writing and empower Creators to feel dynamic and productive and do what they love.

Contrary to so much of the comments, this is one of my favorite new features. In fact, I wish gamified design was really embodied by Substack better, because GenZ own the future of the Creator Economy - we need to embody the best of their generation and their mobile-native preferences. Philosophy and ideology is not the goal - empowering Creators with a stack of tools is.

Expand full comment

Artists are not creators and Substack is a place for true artists.

Artists create from their soul. Creators, "Talent" create to make money and get stuck on an endless content generation treadmill.

While the two terms are used interchangeably, they are not the same. Gamification is everywhere else on the Internet, there are plenty of place to go for that soul crushing vibe. Let's not turn Substack into yet another place like that. Artists don't need a "badge" to motivate themselves because they are already motivated intrinsically.

The artists in GenZ will do just fine without an artificial "badge" to motivate them.

Expand full comment

Yes!! Yes 👏

Expand full comment

I agree, Clint. As you say, artists have intrinsic motivation

Expand full comment

Creators are artist. My hubby for instance is a software developer (creator). He creates code. With this code he creates art, for instance video games.

I'm a Top Writer on Medium. I consider myself as both. According to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, an artist is a person who creates art using skill and creativity.

Expand full comment

Grotesque. Imagine Hemingway or Joan Didion writing and working via ‘gamification’ theory.

Expand full comment

Touché

Expand full comment

Gen Z? Is that all you care about?

Expand full comment

That is so not true for all genres of writing.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Nov 11, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Great word 😏 Apt.

Expand full comment

Hello there, could you please add PayPal as a payment method on Substack? There are a lot of countries including South Africa, which is my country, that are not supported by Stripe. So, there is no way to monetize and build a sustainable business. I have sent you a PM twice, but you have not replied yet.

Please, I beg of you to do this. You have the power to make this decision.

Expand full comment

No more caste systems on digital platforms please.

Expand full comment

Exactly.

Expand full comment

Instead of messing around with rank by numerical metric, why don’t y’all make it so books published serially to Substack can be read in sequence on the app?

Because right now, they can’t be read in sequence without great difficulty. The app functionality for this key demographic is very poor.

Details here: https://charlottedune.substack.com/p/do-we-really-want-email-novels?r=8gb2e&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post

Expand full comment

Yes, I've been asking for the ability to toggle posts in ascending or descending order for quite some time. The best solution so far was suggested recently by someone in the Fictionistas group here on Substack. Pin your first chapter to the top of your post list. Insert a button at the bottom of chapter 1 with a link to chapter 2, and so on, so that the reader can easily keep reading. Take a quick look at one of the books (sections) on my Substack and you can see how it works.

Expand full comment

Yes exactly. It’s very clunky right now and there is too much friction, especially in the app for a reader to navigate. So many easy solutions too—like the toggle button.

Expand full comment

I see you've done something similar in your about section!

Expand full comment

I also just make a table of contents post and pin that to the top.

Expand full comment

I'll take your suggestion over some stupid badge any day. I gave up trying to read a serialized book.

Expand full comment

It’s challenging at the moment to read serial books on Substack. I really hope they improve this feature.

Expand full comment

✌️Seconded

Expand full comment

Yeah I thought that as well. Twitter-style.

Expand full comment

Twitter style! That is a shit show to navigate.

Expand full comment

I agree. Some of us are trying to share wisdom that will help people find deeper happiness and inner peace - a surprisingly niche interest. We will never attract the readership of highly contentious, politically-based authors. But does that make what we do less worthy?

Expand full comment

This exactly

Expand full comment

"Some of us are trying to share wisdom that will help people find deeper happiness and inner peace"

This is exactly the aim with my newsletter, "moviewise: Life Lessons From Movies".

Here are a few of my articles on happiness:

Going Through An Existential Crisis?

https://moviewise.substack.com/p/going-through-an-existential-crisis

Be Relentlessly Happy 🤗

https://moviewise.substack.com/p/be-relentlessly-happy

On Good vs Evil or Contentment vs Anger

https://moviewise.substack.com/p/on-good-vs-evil-or-contentment-vs

The Wisdom In "Kung Fu Panda" (2008): Laughing All The Way To Peace, Harmony, and Focus

https://moviewise.substack.com/p/the-wisdom-in-kung-fu-panda

The Meaning Of Life According To The Movies (A Virtual Comedy Film Festival)

https://moviewise.substack.com/p/the-meaning-of-life

Expand full comment

Good point!

Expand full comment

Isn’t this also exposing people’s financials? Cause you can multiply their subscription cost by the badge tier? Seems un private to reveal the number of subs on this platform since it’s tied to a monetary figure.

Expand full comment

Good catch!

Expand full comment

Yes. This.

Expand full comment

Wonderfully articulated.

Expand full comment

I missed this for months. Idk how. And clearly it’s staying since it’s been around since Nov. Now I’m okay with not publishing as often. Bc I can’t do be part of the rat race.

Expand full comment

If Substack is calculating the "% of reading", that will be a better measure of how good the writing is. Instead of adding up "total cash", calculate how much "time" is spent by reader on a writer's articles. If I am reading someone's post 100% that means I love it. "Number of 100% reads" or "total time sent reading" will be better measures.

Expand full comment

This punishes longer posts and is not about quality regardless.

Expand full comment

Exactly. Sometimes things can be said completely in a sentence or two. The rest is just filler.

Expand full comment

Excellent suggestion.

Expand full comment

That’s a good idea 👍

Expand full comment

That's an interesting idea but is it possible to calculate reading time in the email inbox?

Expand full comment

I don't think it is possible for Email inbox. Only in the app, it's possible. It's a tough metrics fo measure. I thought Substack is no more a newsletter, at least baesed on the new features thay are adding.

Expand full comment

like Kindle reading. I like that idea, but worth bearing in mind that some authors don't, because it affects their royalties. I know that doesn't apply here - yet. But if such a measure is introduced, and it's public, it becomes just another badge by any other name. I think newsletters should be judged by their worth to a potential reader, not in comparison with others.

Expand full comment

Absolutely agree. Substack's value is in its curatorial nature, and that there is no competition between newsletters (most readers might not even realise that 'Substack' exists as a common platform). Connections only form when the *writers* want them to. It's great for writers and *especially* for readers.

The problem, I suspect, is that this approach doesn't necessarily help grow Substack as a business as fast as they'd like.

Expand full comment

Thanks, Simon. I'm sure you're right about Substack's motives. It's such a shame, because for me the community aspects and the mutual helping out are what makes Substack stand out from others. I also wonder if the badges thing will dampen down collaboration to some extent. I'm thinking that I don't constantly think about how many subscribers other people have, but if I had it 'thrown in my face' all the time that X has a purple badge, and therefore a mega subscription base, I'm not sure if I'd feel confident enough to approach them to ask if they'd be interested in a collaboration.

Expand full comment

I don't think the two things are mutually exclusive: it's just a tricky needle to thread for Substack. But they've been pretty clever about everything so far!

I get what you're saying about confidence of networking with 'bigger' writers, but that's been the case for a while as newsletters already indicated free/paid subscriber levels via text, if not a badge.

Expand full comment

True, but apart from when you go to their 'subscribe' page I don't think you see that. But you're right. I suppose I just have an objection to badges in this context!

Expand full comment

Within the current gestalt this makes total sense. Growing a business in current environment has got to be tough - especially growing one amidst Silicon Valley with motivations to help us as human beings form the world we want our children to live it. It is a tall order. I would like to know which Cloud platform SubStack uses.

Expand full comment

I think the entire badging is problematic which intends to make Substack as another social media app with dopamine boosting and gaming features.

Expand full comment

I get a dopamine boost every time someone subscribes, and a drop every time they unsubscribe (so I've turned off notifications about the latter!). But I know what you mean, badges seems like a further step in that direction :-(

Expand full comment

Technically tricky, I imagine. 'Time spent reading' would also encourage people to write unnecessarily long articles - and would penalise short-form writers, comics/sketch writers/illustrators and so on. It's a tricky problem!

Expand full comment

I totally agree with this

Expand full comment

Yesterday I was listening to Lenny's Podcast with Sachin Monga, and I remember the point being made that you had some 'exciting new features for readers' coming soon.

I'm assuming this is one of them - the idea being that readers are in control and can vote with their wallets so to speak on what they support and like. The consumer-driven approach to product growth can be a powerful way to increase engagement, but systematically we've seen how things go for creatives when it comes to marketplace acceptance. The value of creativity is too abstract to simplify into a transaction.

If writers and artists were truly valued for their contributions to society, Substack wouldn't be a platform - we'd already have ways of rewarding those contributions. I think most readers want to support creativity, but they legitimately don't have any meaningful metrics to do so. It is much easier to just seek a creator with a well-established audience. But the big names and numbers garner an outsized respect - the psychological impact affects everyone negatively as it inherently places more social and economic value on one over others.

I'm pro-capitalist in a lot of ways, and I understand that you're trying to make money here. I also admire the fact that you are actively encouraging writers on how to hustle. What I don't like is the way this feature rewards that game over the creation of art.

Expand full comment

The percentage of 100% read (i.e. how many people read your work to the end) would be a decent metric if we have to have metrics and badges and all the rest of it. Seems harder to game and seems to reward quality writing regardless of number of subs. I dunno, just thinking out loud here.

Expand full comment

I believe it's a pretty good metric for sure. Very few of the Substacks I follow would earn this badge to be honest, haha.

I believe there are tech limitations to this though - readers on email instead of Substack aren't measured by this metric and likely never will be.

Expand full comment

Yes, this is critically important. Any sense SubStack is promoting writers based on numbers and sales will hurt good writing. Writing because you must is very different from writing because you want money. I am not against making money and being an entrepreneur at all. But how we all go about it is critical. Many will be quick to detect and reject becoming potential slaves to the system.

Expand full comment

Definitely, KW. I think that somehow the badges thing introduces another dynamic, an unhealthy one. I'm still working this out for myself, but I don't have a problem with writing on Substack in the hope of earning some money. But hoping to get enough subscribers to merit a coloured badge, even though it amounts to the same thing in a way, seems like an unnecessary diversion.

Expand full comment

Interesting. I agree. Feels like elementary school stars for good behavior. Writing isn't always about numbers - it is about ideas, free speech, and communicaton.

Expand full comment

LOL re badges in elementary school! Yes!

Expand full comment

I think the overall request is that Substack find a way to create equity. If Substack can create a way for everyone (from the worst of writers to the best of writers) to gain a following... I think you’d be on to something. And it might be the most dangerously sublime and exciting thing to happen in the history of media. Somehow though, I think Substack can do it!

Expand full comment

Yes. Ab-so-lute-ly. 100%.

Expand full comment

Thanks, KW. I think the equity thing doesn't work anyway. If someone who clearly can't write very well ends up having some sort of apparently-undeserved prominence, people are going to wonder how that happened. All such measures end up devaluing the currency, so to speak -- at least, that's my opinion!

Expand full comment

For sure. They will try to sink us with numbers. Doesn't work for us lowly "content creators." Wholly owned and subsidized.

Expand full comment

I couldn't agree more. We subsidise our writing by doing that instead of other money-earning activities. Well put.

Expand full comment

At the risk of sounding like an intellectual snob or something, I don't see why bad writing, however defined, should be rewarded artificially. I think Herbert Spencer's idea of the survival of the fittest should apply.

Expand full comment

I am glad you are listening, because this news is so dispiriting, especially since I came here just to escape the algorithms dominating social media and Google. These algos are killing real creativity. As a reader, I have to wade through tonnes of marketing listicles on Google just to get to some authentic content from a real person. Substack has removed that difficulty from me, and I enjoy my weekend mornings reading my Substacks. I rarely pay for stuff online, but I'm finding myself supporting writers by paying for them.

Introducing this will make it harder for me to find new, rising newsletters. I tend to gravitate towards them as they are refreshing and raw. Don't tell me I have to go through the same thing here, wading through hundreds of checkmarked Substacks to get to the newbies?

As a writer just starting out on this platform, it is dispiriting news. I want to be able to write content without worrying about needing to get a checkmark so that I'll be read/seen. I like the current organic recommendation system. It has allowed to discover new newsletters that give me joy.

Please, please don't do this.

Expand full comment

Valid concern for all of us.

Expand full comment

@Chris, most of the comments are not in favor of this feature as it is. So, are you going ahead with this?

Expand full comment

Three years on Substack and still I'm just the nerdy writing girl in high school with a few close friends watching the popular kids do all the great things and win all the badges.

Expand full comment

I think every writer feels this way! There is always something else to strive for, no matter how much "success" you find. That's why you have to tune it out and stay true to the work and our own specific goals. It's something I've been thinking about a lot lately. Here's a great Substack that talks about exactly that from Sari Botton: https://adventuresinjournalism.substack.com/p/confessions-of-a-reluctant-gatekeeper

Expand full comment

I came to Substack so people could see my writing. It was an exhaustive search through all other platforms. I did so much research to find the right fit. I didn't have subscribers when I came here. Now I do. I'm so thankful for that. I've made so many friends here.

I don't think this badge system is very fair. It seems to me that those with badges will climb to the top. I look for people who I enjoy reading their writing, not badges.

What is a bestseller as you say? It seems to me, it's only those who have paid subscribers. Just because they are a bestseller, doesn't mean they are the perfect newsletter to subscribe to. And might not even be an interest to you. What about free publications?

It seems like you keep adding more features but never ask any of us what our opinions are of this. You started the poll option. Maybe you should put a poll up on all these "so-called features".

You recently changed how we receive replies to our posts and likes. I emailed support about it. Did I receive an answer to my question? Nope, that was on 11/8/22. It says on the script email that "a member of our support team will be in touch soon". 5 days later, nothing.

Expand full comment

How about offering badges based on IMPACT to someone’s life rather than the usual economy metrics that reproduce the same old hierarchies as other platforms?

Expand full comment

So far I am SO impressed about what Substack can do! Way to go guys. 😎

Expand full comment

Positive feedback and a reliance on the importance of free speech is invaluable. They dance real good so far for a Silicon Valley corporation.

Expand full comment

Recently, a reader posted a huffy comment to Dan Rather. She had multiplied his subscription price by his number of subscribers and questioned if he needs more money. I responded that she calculated all subscribers, not just paid subscribers. She also probably hadn't calculated that he shares payments with his assistant(s). So maybe some readers wouldn't subscribe to be-badged writers due to an economic fairness evaluation.

Expand full comment

Hi there! I have been on the substack for less than a week, and I love it so far. I came here because it seemed to be a content platform instead of a platform where only the ones that create for profits and analytics matter and rank. I hope that stays true.

As much as I love the platform so far, I can't help but think it would benefit writers and readers more to invest in more valuable tools in the post editor (like a table of contents and the ability to center text) than worry about badges that segregate creators.

I may lack the purpose of the badges because I only see them as beneficial to let potential readers know who is more "successful" on the platform instead of finding content that may interest them.

And by success, I mean who can obtain the most paid subscribers.

Anyways - just my two cents. I am happy to be part of the substack community and want to help make it better.

* (adding edit) Perhaps a badge that reflects reader engagement is a more valuable metric to reward, like someone who reads (scrolls) the entire article? Anyway, just a thought.

Expand full comment

Hi Chris! Glad to meet you. Thanks for joining this discussion. As a writer - I love SubStack. I have heard your reasons for forming the company. Believe many of us here though are a bit wary of trusting Big Tech companies. (In addition to governments, corporations and institutions, lol.). Badges could be useful if they are used for the right motivations and intents. Please continue this discussion. It is perhaps one of the most important of our times. If you, your company and employees, who back us as writers, have the right motivations and intents we will see that. Actions speak loud - and words.

Expand full comment

I think these are useful. Not everyone makes Substack their full time job, but some do and it reflects the broader publishing industry language of bestsellers, which can help make a newsletter look more professional. Just my two cents as a person trying to make a living on here.

Expand full comment

I avoid bestsellers like a plague.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Nov 10, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

team is looking into it

Expand full comment

Please do not turn Substack into twitter. This is my safe space where I enjoy the luxury of reading beautiful words from many fabulous writers. It doesn’t matter to me if it is free or a subscription. I never look at how many subscribe to a writer. If you have 4 subscribers or 40000 it makes no difference to me. I just like the writing! The number of subscribers is relatively meaningless except to the writer. I am happy for writers who have a lot of subscribers. It gives them confidence and I am happy to pay to read their writing, just like I would pay to buy a book or a magazine subscription. But to check mark them based on subscriptions tarnishes the appeal of the writer to me in someway. Perhaps it’s a twitter hangover, but that’s how I feel. It just doesn’t feel good.

Expand full comment

I agree with you so much. The worst thing that could happen is this place to become the new Twitter.

Expand full comment

Yes, agreed. Many of us are here because we became disillusioned with corporate publishers, mainstream media, universities, governments, corporations and institutions.

Expand full comment

Thank you for listening to us. My loyalty to Substack as a platform to voice my thoughts quadruples just based on knowing I and others here are heard.

Expand full comment

I love everything Substack is doing for writers. Truly, I appreciate it. But I think the top selling badge might go a little bit too far into turning this into something else. I mean, there’s no doubt that we’re all here too hopefully make some money, but I’d like the “writing first” aspect of it. This goes a bit too far toward “making money” first.

Expand full comment

Agreed. I don't really see, as someone who would not be earning a badge, how it would inspire me to grow. It just feels kind of shitty. I think it's pretty obvious who is making money and who is not (they already say how many paid subscribers people have without a badge, which I already find off-putting), and usually the people who have badges possess something that I do not, and perhaps will not have at any point, such as a major literary career or massive following. It feels kind of like Pelaton :)

Expand full comment

As a quick aside, everybody should read Sarah Wheeler bc she's so smart and funny and cool and if I had badges to give out she'd get every single one of them but they'd be like super gaudy with lots of tassels.

Expand full comment

haha stop. and yours would have a little hat with an esoteric but somehow relatable image on it!

Expand full comment

Well, based on what Garrett has said I'm going to look at your newsletter, Sarah -- which only goes to show, I think, that word-of-mouth has a lot more going for it than badges and all that kind of stuff.

Expand full comment

"No, no... you see, there's a story behind the thing on my hat! Wait, you'll love it... why are you leaving???"

Expand full comment

Agree: we know who the heavy-hitters on the platform are; seems superfluous to add the Twitter-like blue check mark ✅

Expand full comment

“…shitty.” Thank you!

Expand full comment

Totally agree with this comment.

Expand full comment

I agree, Sarah, well said.

Expand full comment

I completely agree.

Expand full comment

What is your ending emoji? Some people's emojis are replaced by an "obj" square.

Expand full comment

Yes, I see this "obj" square in more and more places. I assume it's an emoji (or a set of emoji) that is specific to a phone they use but can't be read by other machines.

Expand full comment

Touché

Expand full comment

I really dislike this. Hope you will reconsider. It seems with each update, substack is becoming more and more like a social media company, competitive and having us rank against each other.

Expand full comment

I’ve felt similarly; as SS grows it seems to edge slowly closer and closer to other traditional platforms

Expand full comment

What about writers that don’t charge money for their writing or don’t paywall anything? Are free subscribers not worth noting?

Expand full comment

Agreed. My favorite thing about Substack is its focus on writing, and to me it feels like it muddies the water to focus on paid subscribers like this

Expand full comment

Solid point

Expand full comment

Hmm, this sparks an instant sense of defeat.

Expand full comment

Ha! So well put. Yes this.

Expand full comment

This for me too.

Expand full comment

I hear ya

Expand full comment

haha, yup!

Expand full comment

I don't know about this. It seems like a way to get writers to chase the badges, which is good for Substack, the company, but I'm not sure what the incentive is for the writers themselves. "Look how many paid subscribers I have" is not something I would really want to say aloud, which is what the badge would effectively do, and it feels somewhat counter to building community with other writers by establishing visible tiers. I could be wrong!

Expand full comment

Thank you for this feedback.

Our intention here was not to change the incentives -- there is already an incentive to get paid subscribers! -- but to help make this legible in a way that is useful to readers and writers.

But I hear what you're saying, and we'll take it into account.

Expand full comment

I can understand logically why you would think this makes sense. If you were dealing with ‘logical’ people. But you aren’t you’re dealing with writers. Artists. Weirdos (in the best way).

By which I mean of course we want to make money but we are for the most part sensitive feelers. And broadcasting your material success with an overt badge isn’t cool in this world. Popularity and artistic greatness do not necessarily go hand in hand. They can do but it’s not an absolute correlation.

When it said ‘hundreds or paid subs’ on my acc that was okay because it was subtle. But overt signalling and the creation of a tier system like this isn’t. I know this sounds like hipster nonsense but trust me on this. Substacks success to date has been predicated on having a reputation for quality writers and thinkers. Badges will (subconsciously perhaps) make people water down their work in the hope of securing dopamine and shiny objects. Or it will make them give up entirely if they don’t succeed in these material terms.

I hope people will back me up on this and show I’m not spouting nonsense.

Expand full comment