As I philosopher, I found a post on money management by AJ Ayers very puzzling. Every philosopher knows that AJ Ayers was a British analytical philosopher, best known through his book "Language, Truth, and Logic".
It is good to see another AJ Ayer, one whose writings actually make sense -- as opposed to those of the British philosopher of the same name..
I also totally thought this was going to be about the philosopher and then I was startled to find out otherwise. Disappointed even. I was hoping the old positivist had a plus side.
There is no financial advice in the Universe that will help. It doesn't matter what you write or have thought up.
The only thing that will help is if we stop using money and share everything so that we all have enough. That is in our nature, not hoarding our skills and services and then finding clever ways to literally extort from our fellow family members.
Buying and selling is a learned habit that comes from social conditioning and if we question this we will see how ludicrous and destructive it is to keep using it.
Humanity is a family and it must remember how to share or it is evolutionarily doomed.
Isn't your philosophy the same as the one that guided the Pilgrims in Plymouth, Mass circa 1620?
In the Mayflower Compact, private property was virtually non-existent and everyone was to get an equal share of the food they grew no matter how much effort any individual put into growing that food.
How did it turn out? Why did it fail? Why did they do much better in 1623 when they abruptly shifted to more of a private-property-based model? What can be learned from that whole experience?
The answers to your questions are psychological. Those people were not emotionally evolved enough to do what is natural. The ego always gets in the way. They had issues to work out. Even later in time, those who drafted our Declaration kept slaves. We evolve one step at a time.
It is unnatural for us to hoard and keep from others what they need. How does it feel when you refuse to give something you have unless you immediately get money back? It may feel “right” bc you think you are protecting yourself, but what if you weren’t concerned about that? What if you never had to think about that bc you lived in a society that cared about you and loved you?
Our nature is to to operate from the goodness of our hearts. It is fear of not having what we need and programs about deservance that keep us from freely sharing.
There is no lack of anything; just the lack of circulating it. There is more than enough food for all, but some are starving bc the food isn’t getting to them.
We are taught that it is wrong to give. That is dark programming from outside our true nature. We are taught that we have to work hard to deserve to eat. This all comes from feeling lack of self-worth. I am not good enough, therefore I have to prove my worth before I can eat. No one should get anything s/he hasn’t worked for, meaning proven, according to current social standards, that they are good enough.
Why let the ego get in the way like that? Why let fear control us? That view is clearly mean-spirited. It feels good to share- our hearts are open then. But it feels bad to hold back, bc then our hearts are closed.
What I am espousing is not “my philosophy,” but natural wisdom, and how things will be in the future, as we drop our silly “I-me-mine!” attitude and think instead, “Us-we-ours.”
There is an expression pervasive in tribal living:
“If it isn’t good for everyone, it isn’t good for anyone.”
There is no defense for letting others go hungry or homeless or have any other lack when we could enjoy everyone having plenty.
These root psychological beliefs that have literally destroyed our well-being must be examined, seen for what they are and discarded bc they are dysfunctional. In other words, we have to get over ourselves. We have to stop being right, so we all can be happy.
I have several articles here on SS that deal with this. If you are interested, start with my introductory piece and it will explain more about this:
"Consciousness and Creativity - Humanity’s True Major in Life"
Are you trying out like a prophetical style or something? It may be the time for it, but it does leave your thinking somewhat unclear to me. I don’t understand your use of/appeal to nature. Are you able to be more systematic with your use of evolution and nature? If we are always evolving toward this ideal state you imagine, then one might think it contradictory to say that this is also already our nature. Based on my own research and background, it looks to me like you are conflating an idealized past with an idealized future, both of which are really constructions of fantasy within the present moment. Perhaps you could clarify things by laying out some concrete steps to take, even if only conceptually, to identify and realize what you are calling the as-yet-unrealized-pre-and-post-cultural-human-pure-nature? Also, I would be curious to know how you imagine tribal relations be realized universally and globally while still preserving the tribal wisdom of familial sharing? Surely it must take some heft cultural labor for me to realize my tribal/familial duty to people I have not nor ever will meet? I would also be curious to hear you analysis on the social history of currency and trade. It does not seem obvious to me that money is an intrinsic evil rather than morally neutral. At the very least, having been paid for something I gave to a friend could help fascilitate the return of that favor later on, perhaps by helping us to determine what is fair for each of us to contribute to a shared activity based on our circumstances and past. For example, it’s my turn to provide the food, or to cover the cost of coffee. I look forward to your thoughtful responses to my sincere invitation to you to explain in more detail the natural wisdom you seek to reveal with your philosophy.
The answers are already in the response I gave to David Leeper above. I will clarify more and recommend that you read my articles to get a better idea of what I am saying.
My responses are in bold here:
Are you trying out like a prophetical style or something? No, I am simply conveying natural wisdom. Everyone knows this inside themselves, but, most of us are so heavily programmed by the left-hemisphere-oriented thinking that society force-feeds us with, that what is natural looks like a fantasy.
Here’s a quote from mythologist John Lamb Lash to clarify:
Kindness that comes naturally, not dictated by divine decree or underwritten by a superhuman scheme of reward and punishment, may be inconceivable to many people at this late date in history. Why? Because dominator culture so degrades the human spirit that people under its spell cannot believe in any morality not dictated from on high and enforced by domination.
It may be the time for it, but it does leave your thinking somewhat unclear to me. I don’t understand your use of/appeal to nature. Are you able to be more systematic with your use of evolution and nature? If we are always evolving toward this ideal state you imagine, then one might think it contradictory to say that this is also already our nature. Based on my own research and background, it looks to me like you are conflating an idealized past with an idealized future, both of which are really constructions of fantasy within the present moment.
You are clearly approaching this from your left brain, wanting a system to explain the natural to you. Normal thinking mind cannot understand this. In order to understand the obvious here you have to open your right hemisphere to intuition and realize through contemplation - not study - what the truth here is. You can’t figure it out; it is a matter of directly knowing it. I am not idealizing anything, and yes, now is the time for this.
Perhaps you could clarify things by laying out some concrete steps to take, even if only conceptually, to identify and realize what you are calling the as-yet-unrealized-pre-and-post-cultural-human-pure-nature?
The step is simple. Relax, and allow yourself to find it inside you. You can call it meditation if you want, but it’s simpler than that. “Self-realization” in the spiritual practices is something many people have already accomplished; it is not some utopian place in the possible future. It is our true nature. We aver simply forgotten what we are. What we really are, not this physical, ego-based person. Our person-hood is a vehicle, not what we really are.
Also, I would be curious to know how you imagine tribal relations be realized universally and globally while still preserving the tribal wisdom of familial sharing? Surely it must take some heft cultural labor for me to realize my tribal/familial duty to people I have not nor ever will meet?
All it will take is for us to realize that we are a family of souls on this planet, created by divine decree, and that the only way a family can thrive is if it takes good care of its members and shares so everyone has enough. No need to suffer. There is already plenty of everything. All other details of “relations” between family members sort themselves out organically, because when we are not in the power of ego mind thinking and fearing, plotting and planning, we are guided by higher consciousness in what has been called by Mayan scholar, Carl Calleman, “a divinely-orchestrated anarchy.”
I would also be curious to hear you analysis on the social history of currency and trade. It does not seem obvious to me that money is an intrinsic evil rather than morally neutral. At the very least, having been paid for something I gave to a friend could help fascilitate the return of that favor later on, perhaps by helping us to determine what is fair for each of us to contribute to a shared activity based on our circumstances and past. For example, it’s my turn to provide the food, or to cover the cost of coffee. I look forward to your thoughtful responses to my sincere invitation to you to explain in more detail the natural wisdom you seek to reveal with your philosophy.
As I told David, it’s not “my philosophy,” it’s what comes through me, and others, which is natural wisdom. It is innate in us all.
The details you ask about in the last paragraph get sorted out organically when we are not trying to count every friggin’ bean and make sure no one doesn’t get any beans they haven’t worked hard for. That is silly, often mean-spirited thinking and not natural to us. We are not on this planet (which is Round, btw : ) to work for a living or earn anything. We are here to wake up to the truth of what we are - Awareness.
There is no reason to use any form of money - which is nothing but conditional love - nor any form of exchange, bc we simply don’t have to. Sharing is the obvious way of being with each other when we are not worried about whether there is enough or anything like that, which all comes from the limitations in thinking taught to us literally by dark forces.
Imagine living in a world in which you knew you had everything you would need to thrive and pursue your vocation. A place where everyone took it for granted that Source would provide what they need. Imagine not worrying bc there is no need to, knowing that everyone is in a state of frequency in which they understand that this is simply the best way, the way in which everyone will have the greatest fulfillment.
I understand that this is hard to do, but that is bc we have been taught over thousands of generations to think otherwise. The simplest fact here is this:
Love is what really runs the universe. We were forced out of our frequency with that a long time ago. Now we are getting back into it. The result will be that all this that I have written will just be obvious.
I hope this is enough to help you see a higher path. Please read my articles, starting with the first one:
Consciousness and Creativity - Humanity’s True Major in Life
I have published twelve articles since I started here two months ago, and while they have different kinds of titles most of them will give you clarification on what you seek.
Thank you for the response! I definitely vibe with what you’re saying overall. I still would insist that this is ‘your’ philosophy, as I think it is neglectful and sophistical to pretend that one speaks from a truth that is not the product of their own experience. Especially when you don’t really argue in support of your view. If your concern is to nurture people’s natural wisdom, it is extremely important to provide the clear reasoning behind your position. This is the only way that a pupil may consider your perspective from the standpoint of their own knowledge and understanding. This is perhaps the value of the ‘left hemisphere’, in this context.
However, I personally disagree with the concept of natural wisdom as you are using it. The idea that we have forgotten our true nature is an old metaphysical one, and I would argue that it is also a masculinist one. I prefer to remind myself and others that we are all nurtured into being and wisdom, and while we must remain attuned to how that wisdom is manifested in the present moment and stay grounded in ‘both hemispheres’, as you called them, it is still important to note that no one achieves wisdom without great effort and usually education. I disagree with what appears to be your view of organized religion as straightforwardly a relation of dominance. We should not remove the realm of the religious from this notion of wisdom and awareness, and we should respect spiritual authorities.
I do think you might reconsider your stance on money. But perhaps you have enough of it that you don’t have to.
I would also like to point out that you do, in fact, have a utopian ideology. This is brought out in the end of your reply in which you talk about an imagined world where you had everything you need to thrive and pursue your vocation—a utopia that is in fact real for many people, because they are wealthy. Love doesn’t really run the universe, unless you think money is also love. To deny this, you are placing money outside of love, putting the two into an incompatible opposition, and reducing yourself to contradiction, since then money will run at least some of the universe.
I urge you to reconsider your position that ‘we were forced out of our frequency with that a long time ago’. This is again your utopian, un-grounded idealization. I consider it to be a harmful view to hold, moreover, as it puts you in relation to yourself and your well-being only by filtering it through an imagined ideal past which is also the ideal future you seek to nurture. This is ego-driven thinking, if anything is.
Perhaps it would help you to think more of the ‘left’ and ‘right’ as collaborators, rather than as alternatives. My ‘left’ brain is very well developed, it is true, but it is developed in the service of intuition and truth, and I am not out of touch with my ‘right’ side.
Why do you pose behind a woman’s name, if you are a man?
I do not like your game-playing, which is obviously driving your writing as well.
This is my final response to you.
When you say you “definitely vibe with” me on my overall view, that seems clearly not to be true, as both your messages argue aggressively against everything I’ve said. The fact is, you are much too young to challenge the wisdom of an elder, Me.
What I hear from you is a lot of arrogance and demanding and mistaken-conclusion-drawing about me. I have already explained everything I needed to you, but it will never be enough bc of your stubborn attitude. I am not here to prove anything to you; that is your job. go find out for yourself instead of wasting your time and energy arguing.
I suggest you stop arguing now, not just with me, but with the universe, if what you want is actual answers, and that you practice meditation - which means silence of mouth and openness of mind.
I tried to make my responses in bold, but the system would not accept it, so you'll have to translate, as I could not get it off to redo it in a more readable way.
This was very helpful to read. Financial growth has always been someting that creates a stick my head in the sand reaction for me, as a creative, and I love your approach to this topic. Also, had no idea that some writers on substack can offer readers the opportunity to do a paid subscription without offering anything different from free subscribers (sort of like a donate if you like model?) I am releasing my first article tomorrow about Suicide Prevention. I only have free subscribe turned on now. Do you think I should turn on the option for paid as well? Or wait?
zahvaljujem na predivnom sadržaju ovog intervjua na Substack. Želim Vam svaki uspeh u daljem radu. Preneću svojim prijateljima, kojima trebaju saveti u oblasti finansija tj. Upravljanja novcem da se upoznaju sa Vašim objavama.
Hello Adrian, Sofia Dagg, Joachim, April Wilkner, David G Leeper, Parisse Deza, Suite Sister Mary, Kate Severance, and all. Please see/share our research from Captain Rob Balsamo, Captain Dan Hanley, Amber Quitno, Prof. Tony Martin, Prof. Graeme MacQueen, Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, and others and help us improve it if you can. Thank you!
Thank you for all the encouragement for new writers. It feels like starting now with Substack means we're late and missed the train, but I appreciate the advice of continuing to create quality content and trust that good work will compound over time.
As I philosopher, I found a post on money management by AJ Ayers very puzzling. Every philosopher knows that AJ Ayers was a British analytical philosopher, best known through his book "Language, Truth, and Logic".
It is good to see another AJ Ayer, one whose writings actually make sense -- as opposed to those of the British philosopher of the same name..
I also totally thought this was going to be about the philosopher and then I was startled to find out otherwise. Disappointed even. I was hoping the old positivist had a plus side.
His name is/was AYER, not Ayers, that is: no S.
There is no financial advice in the Universe that will help. It doesn't matter what you write or have thought up.
The only thing that will help is if we stop using money and share everything so that we all have enough. That is in our nature, not hoarding our skills and services and then finding clever ways to literally extort from our fellow family members.
Buying and selling is a learned habit that comes from social conditioning and if we question this we will see how ludicrous and destructive it is to keep using it.
Humanity is a family and it must remember how to share or it is evolutionarily doomed.
Isn't your philosophy the same as the one that guided the Pilgrims in Plymouth, Mass circa 1620?
In the Mayflower Compact, private property was virtually non-existent and everyone was to get an equal share of the food they grew no matter how much effort any individual put into growing that food.
How did it turn out? Why did it fail? Why did they do much better in 1623 when they abruptly shifted to more of a private-property-based model? What can be learned from that whole experience?
The answers to your questions are psychological. Those people were not emotionally evolved enough to do what is natural. The ego always gets in the way. They had issues to work out. Even later in time, those who drafted our Declaration kept slaves. We evolve one step at a time.
It is unnatural for us to hoard and keep from others what they need. How does it feel when you refuse to give something you have unless you immediately get money back? It may feel “right” bc you think you are protecting yourself, but what if you weren’t concerned about that? What if you never had to think about that bc you lived in a society that cared about you and loved you?
Our nature is to to operate from the goodness of our hearts. It is fear of not having what we need and programs about deservance that keep us from freely sharing.
There is no lack of anything; just the lack of circulating it. There is more than enough food for all, but some are starving bc the food isn’t getting to them.
We are taught that it is wrong to give. That is dark programming from outside our true nature. We are taught that we have to work hard to deserve to eat. This all comes from feeling lack of self-worth. I am not good enough, therefore I have to prove my worth before I can eat. No one should get anything s/he hasn’t worked for, meaning proven, according to current social standards, that they are good enough.
Why let the ego get in the way like that? Why let fear control us? That view is clearly mean-spirited. It feels good to share- our hearts are open then. But it feels bad to hold back, bc then our hearts are closed.
What I am espousing is not “my philosophy,” but natural wisdom, and how things will be in the future, as we drop our silly “I-me-mine!” attitude and think instead, “Us-we-ours.”
There is an expression pervasive in tribal living:
“If it isn’t good for everyone, it isn’t good for anyone.”
There is no defense for letting others go hungry or homeless or have any other lack when we could enjoy everyone having plenty.
These root psychological beliefs that have literally destroyed our well-being must be examined, seen for what they are and discarded bc they are dysfunctional. In other words, we have to get over ourselves. We have to stop being right, so we all can be happy.
I have several articles here on SS that deal with this. If you are interested, start with my introductory piece and it will explain more about this:
"Consciousness and Creativity - Humanity’s True Major in Life"
https://parissedeza.substack.com/publish/post/158607303
Are you trying out like a prophetical style or something? It may be the time for it, but it does leave your thinking somewhat unclear to me. I don’t understand your use of/appeal to nature. Are you able to be more systematic with your use of evolution and nature? If we are always evolving toward this ideal state you imagine, then one might think it contradictory to say that this is also already our nature. Based on my own research and background, it looks to me like you are conflating an idealized past with an idealized future, both of which are really constructions of fantasy within the present moment. Perhaps you could clarify things by laying out some concrete steps to take, even if only conceptually, to identify and realize what you are calling the as-yet-unrealized-pre-and-post-cultural-human-pure-nature? Also, I would be curious to know how you imagine tribal relations be realized universally and globally while still preserving the tribal wisdom of familial sharing? Surely it must take some heft cultural labor for me to realize my tribal/familial duty to people I have not nor ever will meet? I would also be curious to hear you analysis on the social history of currency and trade. It does not seem obvious to me that money is an intrinsic evil rather than morally neutral. At the very least, having been paid for something I gave to a friend could help fascilitate the return of that favor later on, perhaps by helping us to determine what is fair for each of us to contribute to a shared activity based on our circumstances and past. For example, it’s my turn to provide the food, or to cover the cost of coffee. I look forward to your thoughtful responses to my sincere invitation to you to explain in more detail the natural wisdom you seek to reveal with your philosophy.
Hi Iris,
It is good that you ask these questions.
The answers are already in the response I gave to David Leeper above. I will clarify more and recommend that you read my articles to get a better idea of what I am saying.
My responses are in bold here:
Are you trying out like a prophetical style or something? No, I am simply conveying natural wisdom. Everyone knows this inside themselves, but, most of us are so heavily programmed by the left-hemisphere-oriented thinking that society force-feeds us with, that what is natural looks like a fantasy.
Here’s a quote from mythologist John Lamb Lash to clarify:
Kindness that comes naturally, not dictated by divine decree or underwritten by a superhuman scheme of reward and punishment, may be inconceivable to many people at this late date in history. Why? Because dominator culture so degrades the human spirit that people under its spell cannot believe in any morality not dictated from on high and enforced by domination.
It may be the time for it, but it does leave your thinking somewhat unclear to me. I don’t understand your use of/appeal to nature. Are you able to be more systematic with your use of evolution and nature? If we are always evolving toward this ideal state you imagine, then one might think it contradictory to say that this is also already our nature. Based on my own research and background, it looks to me like you are conflating an idealized past with an idealized future, both of which are really constructions of fantasy within the present moment.
You are clearly approaching this from your left brain, wanting a system to explain the natural to you. Normal thinking mind cannot understand this. In order to understand the obvious here you have to open your right hemisphere to intuition and realize through contemplation - not study - what the truth here is. You can’t figure it out; it is a matter of directly knowing it. I am not idealizing anything, and yes, now is the time for this.
Perhaps you could clarify things by laying out some concrete steps to take, even if only conceptually, to identify and realize what you are calling the as-yet-unrealized-pre-and-post-cultural-human-pure-nature?
The step is simple. Relax, and allow yourself to find it inside you. You can call it meditation if you want, but it’s simpler than that. “Self-realization” in the spiritual practices is something many people have already accomplished; it is not some utopian place in the possible future. It is our true nature. We aver simply forgotten what we are. What we really are, not this physical, ego-based person. Our person-hood is a vehicle, not what we really are.
Also, I would be curious to know how you imagine tribal relations be realized universally and globally while still preserving the tribal wisdom of familial sharing? Surely it must take some heft cultural labor for me to realize my tribal/familial duty to people I have not nor ever will meet?
All it will take is for us to realize that we are a family of souls on this planet, created by divine decree, and that the only way a family can thrive is if it takes good care of its members and shares so everyone has enough. No need to suffer. There is already plenty of everything. All other details of “relations” between family members sort themselves out organically, because when we are not in the power of ego mind thinking and fearing, plotting and planning, we are guided by higher consciousness in what has been called by Mayan scholar, Carl Calleman, “a divinely-orchestrated anarchy.”
I would also be curious to hear you analysis on the social history of currency and trade. It does not seem obvious to me that money is an intrinsic evil rather than morally neutral. At the very least, having been paid for something I gave to a friend could help fascilitate the return of that favor later on, perhaps by helping us to determine what is fair for each of us to contribute to a shared activity based on our circumstances and past. For example, it’s my turn to provide the food, or to cover the cost of coffee. I look forward to your thoughtful responses to my sincere invitation to you to explain in more detail the natural wisdom you seek to reveal with your philosophy.
As I told David, it’s not “my philosophy,” it’s what comes through me, and others, which is natural wisdom. It is innate in us all.
The details you ask about in the last paragraph get sorted out organically when we are not trying to count every friggin’ bean and make sure no one doesn’t get any beans they haven’t worked hard for. That is silly, often mean-spirited thinking and not natural to us. We are not on this planet (which is Round, btw : ) to work for a living or earn anything. We are here to wake up to the truth of what we are - Awareness.
There is no reason to use any form of money - which is nothing but conditional love - nor any form of exchange, bc we simply don’t have to. Sharing is the obvious way of being with each other when we are not worried about whether there is enough or anything like that, which all comes from the limitations in thinking taught to us literally by dark forces.
Imagine living in a world in which you knew you had everything you would need to thrive and pursue your vocation. A place where everyone took it for granted that Source would provide what they need. Imagine not worrying bc there is no need to, knowing that everyone is in a state of frequency in which they understand that this is simply the best way, the way in which everyone will have the greatest fulfillment.
I understand that this is hard to do, but that is bc we have been taught over thousands of generations to think otherwise. The simplest fact here is this:
Love is what really runs the universe. We were forced out of our frequency with that a long time ago. Now we are getting back into it. The result will be that all this that I have written will just be obvious.
I hope this is enough to help you see a higher path. Please read my articles, starting with the first one:
Consciousness and Creativity - Humanity’s True Major in Life
https://parissedeza.substack.com/publish/post/158607303
I have published twelve articles since I started here two months ago, and while they have different kinds of titles most of them will give you clarification on what you seek.
Blessings, Parisse
Thank you for the response! I definitely vibe with what you’re saying overall. I still would insist that this is ‘your’ philosophy, as I think it is neglectful and sophistical to pretend that one speaks from a truth that is not the product of their own experience. Especially when you don’t really argue in support of your view. If your concern is to nurture people’s natural wisdom, it is extremely important to provide the clear reasoning behind your position. This is the only way that a pupil may consider your perspective from the standpoint of their own knowledge and understanding. This is perhaps the value of the ‘left hemisphere’, in this context.
However, I personally disagree with the concept of natural wisdom as you are using it. The idea that we have forgotten our true nature is an old metaphysical one, and I would argue that it is also a masculinist one. I prefer to remind myself and others that we are all nurtured into being and wisdom, and while we must remain attuned to how that wisdom is manifested in the present moment and stay grounded in ‘both hemispheres’, as you called them, it is still important to note that no one achieves wisdom without great effort and usually education. I disagree with what appears to be your view of organized religion as straightforwardly a relation of dominance. We should not remove the realm of the religious from this notion of wisdom and awareness, and we should respect spiritual authorities.
I do think you might reconsider your stance on money. But perhaps you have enough of it that you don’t have to.
I would also like to point out that you do, in fact, have a utopian ideology. This is brought out in the end of your reply in which you talk about an imagined world where you had everything you need to thrive and pursue your vocation—a utopia that is in fact real for many people, because they are wealthy. Love doesn’t really run the universe, unless you think money is also love. To deny this, you are placing money outside of love, putting the two into an incompatible opposition, and reducing yourself to contradiction, since then money will run at least some of the universe.
I urge you to reconsider your position that ‘we were forced out of our frequency with that a long time ago’. This is again your utopian, un-grounded idealization. I consider it to be a harmful view to hold, moreover, as it puts you in relation to yourself and your well-being only by filtering it through an imagined ideal past which is also the ideal future you seek to nurture. This is ego-driven thinking, if anything is.
Perhaps it would help you to think more of the ‘left’ and ‘right’ as collaborators, rather than as alternatives. My ‘left’ brain is very well developed, it is true, but it is developed in the service of intuition and truth, and I am not out of touch with my ‘right’ side.
“Iris,”
Why do you pose behind a woman’s name, if you are a man?
I do not like your game-playing, which is obviously driving your writing as well.
This is my final response to you.
When you say you “definitely vibe with” me on my overall view, that seems clearly not to be true, as both your messages argue aggressively against everything I’ve said. The fact is, you are much too young to challenge the wisdom of an elder, Me.
What I hear from you is a lot of arrogance and demanding and mistaken-conclusion-drawing about me. I have already explained everything I needed to you, but it will never be enough bc of your stubborn attitude. I am not here to prove anything to you; that is your job. go find out for yourself instead of wasting your time and energy arguing.
I suggest you stop arguing now, not just with me, but with the universe, if what you want is actual answers, and that you practice meditation - which means silence of mouth and openness of mind.
Parisse
Thank You, Parisse Deza, Namasté, Xhoni
Thank you too, Xhoni. Blessings, Parisse
Hi,
I tried to make my responses in bold, but the system would not accept it, so you'll have to translate, as I could not get it off to redo it in a more readable way.
Thank you, Parisse Deza. Om Mani Padme Hum. Xhoni
Wow, this is an amazing launch story. Good on you, Ally. I hope your growth continues.
This was very helpful to read. Financial growth has always been someting that creates a stick my head in the sand reaction for me, as a creative, and I love your approach to this topic. Also, had no idea that some writers on substack can offer readers the opportunity to do a paid subscription without offering anything different from free subscribers (sort of like a donate if you like model?) I am releasing my first article tomorrow about Suicide Prevention. I only have free subscribe turned on now. Do you think I should turn on the option for paid as well? Or wait?
Great post! Thank you - I just discovered your Substack and will be looking for your book in ‘26.
Very nice post. Thank you!
I respect what she has done. I also have no social media profiles as well. Great motivational article.
Poštovana gospodjo Ajers,
zahvaljujem na predivnom sadržaju ovog intervjua na Substack. Želim Vam svaki uspeh u daljem radu. Preneću svojim prijateljima, kojima trebaju saveti u oblasti finansija tj. Upravljanja novcem da se upoznaju sa Vašim objavama.
Hello Adrian, Sofia Dagg, Joachim, April Wilkner, David G Leeper, Parisse Deza, Suite Sister Mary, Kate Severance, and all. Please see/share our research from Captain Rob Balsamo, Captain Dan Hanley, Amber Quitno, Prof. Tony Martin, Prof. Graeme MacQueen, Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, and others and help us improve it if you can. Thank you!
https://michaelatkinson.substack.com/
Sincerely,
Michael
🦖
Ally is truly making sense, 🤗 though you can read free of charge, a true raw story called 'Behind the Face' https://jollyrroger.substack.com
UNSSUBSCIBE ME FROM THIS SHIT
"The temptation to chase trends or hack your way to faster growth is real, but nothing beats showing up consistently with something valuable to say."
The above was easily the best line in the interview for me. Thanks for sharing, best wishes for your continued success. 👍😊
Aww congrats on your book! 📖 that’s super lovely news AJ. I’ve also subscribed to your stack!
Thank you for all the encouragement for new writers. It feels like starting now with Substack means we're late and missed the train, but I appreciate the advice of continuing to create quality content and trust that good work will compound over time.
Thanks for the shoutout, AJ! Thrilled for you! (And yes, it was a very financially responsible walk during my "no coffee meeting" period!)
BARZ