50 Comments

"...but I explain that paid subscriptions support the huge amount of work it takes to bring them the newsletter. Usually, they have never thought about it from that perspective and end up wanting to pay."

This is probably the biggest hurdle facing writers right now. People have been conditioned to getting free content that they forget someone is creating it for them to enjoy. When the discussion is framed this way, people are almost always willing to pay and/or donate.

Expand full comment

Exactly. I find that honesty and vulnerability make people realize there is a human behind this! Very easy to forget.

Expand full comment

This is to be expected. Everything is moving to a subscription/fee based model. And most people don't want that. They want to buy something and own it.

It's like encyclopedias. People used to buy physical books, so that they could own the knowledge.

Everything is moving towards a society where you "own" nothing. Everything is available at a price. But it's hard to keep knowledge.

Think about all of the PDF websites, the ones that have manuals for everything under the sun, but you have to pay for them. Nobody likes that. Nobody want's to pay to look something up, when the manufacturer used to provide it for free. Now even the manufacturer wants your information, so they can sell you stuff -- before they will show you the manual.

The world is moving away from an individualist society, and towards a collectivist society -- while simultaneously, people are gaining the ability to individually acquire more knowledge.

Personally I prefer the individualist society, because there are far fewer restrictions.

Myself, I maintain my own Wiki. Using the MediaWiki engine. I did this many years ago, because I wanted a place to store the info I've acquired working in the automation field for 16+ years. You'll have something that you researched for 5 hours 6 years ago, not something that you would remember. That's where the wiki came in hand.

Expand full comment

I love this newsletter! The format is so delightful — and I’ve purchased two recommendations already. (I wore the Tory Burch pants on Thanksgiving.) How do affiliate links figure into your strategy for making this a viable part of your freelance career?

Expand full comment

Hi Erika, thank you! Learning to navigate affiliate linking has been a challenge, and some days it feels like a full time job just figuring out how to sign up for the platforms! I would say at this point about half of what I offer is affiliate linked. What I do is create the full newsletter and then go back and see what is linkable. I feel privelged that I was sheltered from affiliate linking for so long at WSJ and I've seen people go down that path and then get blinded by the data and start to water down their content based on what is linkable. So I'm EXTREMELY conscious to not operate that way and put the links in in reverse. This way it feels true to what I would endorse, and the affiliates work as a bonus. Ok, now to answer your question. I didn't really factor affiliate linking into becoming a viable part of my career because I started the newsletter to stay connected with myself and with the fashion industry I've worked two decades on building a relationship with. It was mainly to keep my mind sharp and looking for what is new out there. It has definitely been a small added bonus and I might in 2023 evaluate what percentage of my income I can count on affiliates for, but I maintain that its not something I will rely on, to keep my platform authentic, and treat it like a bonus. I would like to use this as a calling card really to maintain my editorial and brand work. Ok, long winded, but hope that answers your question!

Expand full comment

This is such a great response, thank you!

Expand full comment

Thank you for sharing! It struck me that Becky said she truly enjoys the ‘category’ and that it shows in her tone, etc. and then went onto show that what she writes about, 5 weekly points on fashion, really is a category. It’s very valuable to me that these On Substack and Grow newsletters really focus on categories because it’s hard to narrow, and hard to tell people how to narrow, and the best picture of it is these human stories about a real person and their newsletter.

Plus, I get exposed to cool stuff I probably wouldn’t otherwise have been 🙏😊

Expand full comment

I don't say this to be rude - but I'm stunned that this substack has thousands of subscribers. Not because of the quality of the newsletter -- I am a reader and it's great! -- but rather because I have always noted the low number of likes on posts. Given that there are apparently hundreds of paying subscribers (to say nothing of the thousands who've subscribed), I would assume would indicate a deeper willingness to engage. Can you explain that? Is that typical?

Expand full comment

I can’t understand it either but I’m not in the demographic for any “10 things to do in NY” nor “5 things to” kind of things :)

Expand full comment

It depends on the letter. I get quite a few emails, replying to the substack. And I actually get the most engagement when I post to my instagram stories and people reply there. I also never mention "comment below" in the letter which might help with that? And before I started my own Substack I never even noticed the "like" button. So I wonder if its just not on people's radars, especially when they read it in their inbox as opposed to the Substack app or platform itself? There have a been a few posts that clearly hit a nerve and in those people comment and start to converse amongst themselves, which has been fun to watch, but yes I agree, not huge engagement in terms of commenting.

Expand full comment

Thank you for this one. Definitely taking away the “develop a clear format that consistently serves the reader” as the main goal. Still haven’t quite figured out how to do that yet.

Expand full comment

It’s a good suggestion but I find it dumbs down the content I want to talk about. My writing is about a gastronomic journey, hardly something snappy that can fit in a quick “5 things to”. Actually this format that is so used in media “10 restaurants not to miss, 5 dishes under 20 euro” is to me mindblowingy boring and commercial. The issue is that everyone is so accustomed to this, and nobody really enjoys reading longer texts, that the niche of potential readers for essays is a very small pond.

Expand full comment

Totally hear you. Its definitely not the right format for everyone, especially substacks that are about narrative. My goal was always to help with shopping and style so the format made sense.

Expand full comment

I think it also totally depends on your audience. And that's what's cool about writing. There are so many different styles of writers because there are different styles of *readers*! I wouldn't worry about the smaller audience that wants more involved reading. You might be a huge fish in your "small pond"!

Expand full comment

Hi Becky! I’m *very* excited this was published, I just signed up for your newsletter and love the concept. I recently started a (much smaller) newsletter, similarly focused on what to buy, but in the home-goods/interior design space. I’m curious after publishing for so long how you’ve stayed creative within the “five things” boundary. Do you think limiting it to 5 things has helped you churn out a consistent newsletter? Or are there other ways you stay creative & curious? You’re making me re-think my newsletter format in the best way. Thank you!

Expand full comment

What I've learned in editorial all these years is that editing is HARD. Its much easier to write something clever in 750 words than it is to do it in 50 words with all the details you want to share. So I think it actually keeps me sharper. For the car coats newsletter, for example, I probably found about 12 I loved but spent a lot of time weighing which really were the best options with the most variety. The whole point of the newsletter, too, was not to overwhelm the reader. I can't tell you how many newsletters excite me with their headline and then I end up zoom scrolling to the bottom because I just don't have the bandwidth. So, I'm not saying its the only good format, but it was the best for me with what I was trying to do, which is give a very real service to the reader. Only the best, visually and click friendly and not so long they get distracted.

Expand full comment

Becky is lovely! We overlapped a bit at the WSJ and I’ve been a big fan ever since. Adore her newsletter.

Expand full comment

I was wondering if y’all were buds!

Expand full comment

Thank you Elizabeth!!!! And welcome to Substack! :) :) :)

Expand full comment

Half of the World's population is reaching out for Becky's solutions. Choosing an audience

is broadly important. She knows her demographics.

Expand full comment

It's gratifying to have your estimate of this small comment.

Thanks so much,

Kathie

Expand full comment

Becky - I'm an instant fan! I love your concept - so smart and so joyfully served up. I feel like the most well-dressed, yet most generous woman in the office has decided to take me under her wing and show me how it's done. I recently started a newsletter about clothing and based on my post today, it's clear that I need you! Glad to be a subscriber.

Expand full comment

Very good, well done, you grabbed me in the title and I read the 1st paragraph and I read the article to its end, which is very unlike me.

Ron

Expand full comment

I've learned from 20 years in fashion, that service is what connects. Its super important to think about the reader. Why should they care?? I start there often.

Expand full comment

A very helpful interview toward making future newsletter business decisions as a newbie here on Substack, although certainly not a newbie writer.

Expand full comment

Very inspiring! I don’t feel comfortable running a paid subscription yet but someday maybe I will

Expand full comment

Will welcome you when you are! Until then, hope you love what you are reading. Thanks for being here!

Expand full comment

As I consider a Substack future I wonder about niche, which seems to be the content watchword. I’m at what some would consider the other end of the road. I have a lot of experience from a broad swath of the human condition. I’m curious whether it will be criticism or crickets since I’m a little light in the niche department.

Expand full comment

I don't think niche is essential to every Substack. I think it IS important to think about what you are giving the reader, and what makes you worthy of their time. I find that if I feel like I am truly giving myself, it comes through and is a "useful" or at least "engrossing" read. It is often emotionally draining though, too. Every Sunday I get a bit nervous and then exhausted from being nervous, because I do feel like I'm giving my true self. May sound a bit cheesy, but its true!

Expand full comment

One thing for sure this post has gained a lot of traction. I've yet to "Launch" as they say so I'm interested to learn what others have discovered. I suppose at some point I have to jump. I don't have any outstanding achievements to put on my about page. I did manage to raise and or help raise 23 kids but you just have to take my word for that. I don't have any awards and that isn't really the focus I'm thinking about. Looking back, I ran from any kind of publicity and maybe that wasn't a great idea. It's just my personality and I didn't really understand it until about 5 years ago. Guess I'm a little slow. Guess I'm still figuring it out. Not sure what someone would pay for. I've got a bunch of notebooks that I've filled up over the years, maybe some of it will stick.

Expand full comment

Thank you for the answer. Very helpful, especially about being useful and worthy of their time. I have quite a bit of writing but need to run it through the filter.

Expand full comment

Sounds like she really filled a niche where it was strongly desired. Good for her! That said: Clearly she started with a big audience already in place a la the WSJ etc. That’s fine--I’d do the same in her position. But it’s worth noting that most of us don’t start off that way. It’s not real helpful to those of us who aren’t already at the top. Yet: Helpful article in its way. Happy for the success!! I love hearing about professionals leaving their industries and making a living exclusively on Substack. I’m getting there myself, slowly. I write about culture, politics, as well as fiction and personal essays.

Michael Mohr

‘Sincere American Writing’

https://michaelmohr.substack.com/

Expand full comment

Thanks Michael. Yes, it's true, I came from a publishing powerhouse, and I won't discount that. However, I definitely did not have an endorsement from the paper when I started. What WAS helpful in starting though, was making the change clear to the industry peers and friends I made over the years. So in that way, the prior career was helpful. I wasn't even going to post or announce that I was leaving and a friend basically told me I was a FOOL and forced me into it. I wasn't comfortable making such a public declaration. However, she was right. It was a learning experience, that no one was just going to announce or promote the work for me, something I never had to do before at such a major company. Not even sure where I'm going with this, just to say, keep up your good work and shout it from the rooftops! We are our own best advocates. :)

Expand full comment

We can all learn from each other 🔥

Expand full comment

Indeed! And seriously: That’s great and I’m happy for your success. Sounds well-deserved. 🙌

Expand full comment

Find your niche and they will come. What a happy story! I appreciate her honesty with the paid option and she explained it beautifully.

Expand full comment

Hello, thank you and it is a great honor to work with you, dear friends

Expand full comment