The problem is, if it's not directly on the article, the people who have read the article won't know the truth. It's like when a newspaper puts out an error in a story on the front page, but later retracts it with a small blurb inside the paper.
This is true. But I do think this should be restricted to journalism/serious non-fiction. Creative / Fiction Substacks shouldn't have to concern themselves with this extra (but now that you explain it so well, necessary) worry.
This platform CAN expose bad creators. You could do it right now.
Tweet about it—better yet, write about it. Expose them for being dishonest creators.
The problem is, if it's not directly on the article, the people who have read the article won't know the truth. It's like when a newspaper puts out an error in a story on the front page, but later retracts it with a small blurb inside the paper.
This is true. But I do think this should be restricted to journalism/serious non-fiction. Creative / Fiction Substacks shouldn't have to concern themselves with this extra (but now that you explain it so well, necessary) worry.
Agree
Bam, look at us. Solving. Problems.
LOL, that's what an exchange of ideas is all about. It doesn't always end in agreement, but at least the information is out there.