Thank you. I’ve been saying this for years. Renters have zero control; they live off the whims of others. Ownership is the only answer.
If you notice the World Economic Forum is preaching that in 2030, and the new paradigm, means owning nothing and being happy at the same time. This is impossible. The elites want us to own nothing (I'll …
Thank you. I’ve been saying this for years. Renters have zero control; they live off the whims of others. Ownership is the only answer.
If you notice the World Economic Forum is preaching that in 2030, and the new paradigm, means owning nothing and being happy at the same time. This is impossible. The elites want us to own nothing (I'll let you decide who the elites are) and become a serf class again. The new lords or landowners are technocrats, big tech, pharma, and you get the picture. They can buy and sell the new serfs, or us, at will. Do a simple search on serfdom and compare with how most of us live today. You can't help but notice the similarities.
Let's hope this platform stays true to form and never censors anything. For a case study I refer you to the Larry Flint case in the 1970s in the Supreme Court, and other state court cases involving Mr. Flint. Law students at one time were required to study this case as First Amendments studies.
So again, please stay true to the idea of ownership and use this platform as long as they stay true to the principals of free speech.
Thank you. I’ve been saying this for years. Renters have zero control; they live off the whims of others. Ownership is the only answer.
If you notice the World Economic Forum is preaching that in 2030, and the new paradigm, means owning nothing and being happy at the same time. This is impossible. The elites want us to own nothing (I'll let you decide who the elites are) and become a serf class again. The new lords or landowners are technocrats, big tech, pharma, and you get the picture. They can buy and sell the new serfs, or us, at will. Do a simple search on serfdom and compare with how most of us live today. You can't help but notice the similarities.
Let's hope this platform stays true to form and never censors anything. For a case study I refer you to the Larry Flint case in the 1970s in the Supreme Court, and other state court cases involving Mr. Flint. Law students at one time were required to study this case as First Amendments studies.
So again, please stay true to the idea of ownership and use this platform as long as they stay true to the principals of free speech.