Citations, references and reputational scoring of sorts would be helpful features. Links as 'references' have their limitations; formalizing citations and references between papers in a palatable way might also enable better integrity and inherently connects those authors and their followers.
Digitizing some of the format as substack fe…
Citations, references and reputational scoring of sorts would be helpful features. Links as 'references' have their limitations; formalizing citations and references between papers in a palatable way might also enable better integrity and inherently connects those authors and their followers.
Digitizing some of the format as substack features that we already use in education and science communities. Further, enabling cited authors to elaborate, contextualize or even reject another authors reference to their works, for example.
Citations, references and reputational scoring of sorts would be helpful features. Links as 'references' have their limitations; formalizing citations and references between papers in a palatable way might also enable better integrity and inherently connects those authors and their followers.
Digitizing some of the format as substack features that we already use in education and science communities. Further, enabling cited authors to elaborate, contextualize or even reject another authors reference to their works, for example.