4 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

I cannot support Substack as a model unless they make all publications free with optional and variable financial support. Right now $50 is the minimum and even writers who want to take less are not allowed to do so. I've been able to privately support writers with lesser amounts. Who can afford $50 a pop? The Wealthy. It's an elitist model and as unegalitarian as it gets. We need a BBC model. I love Heather and she deserves her earnings but you can read her without paying if you wish. Others use a come-on taser model. Sucks!

Expand full comment

So you want them to remove the ability for writers to earn money from their writing? That's the antithesis of what the platform is about. $50 is an annual sub and if you can't afford that you could just pay for a month (or a couple of months) to the amount you wish to pay the writer. Writers have chosen to offer paid subs because they want to make money- they can charge less by making the content free.

Expand full comment

+1

The ideas that "everything should be free" comes up a lot on here. It's a digital writing version of crabs in a bucket. I don't get it.

Expand full comment

I think they’re trying to create a premium bar and prevent a race to the bottom for pricing

Expand full comment