216 Comments

This is supposed to be a site supporting writers, not market speculators, gamblers, false prophets and snake-oil sales persons. (I'd put an emoji here, but emojis don't seem to be "embedded.")

Expand full comment

I speculate that before even the main search box is fixed (posts from most accounts opened within the past year STILL aren't indexed) and other top fixes that support writers will come (1) ads and (2) targeted selling of your profile

Expand full comment

If these market speculator people are so unreliable and writers are better, than it should be easy for them to prove it by placing bets on these markets. Political pundits should be more accurate predictors and make more money off these sites if that's the case. If they're just snake oil, it should be easy.

Expand full comment

THANK YOU, WAYNE ROBBINS. THE GRAB TO CONTROL OUR THOUGHTS NEVER ENDS.

Expand full comment

Sorry Wayne, money follow the incentives.

Expand full comment

You think you know something. Don’t overestimate yourself, nor sidestep the premise.

Expand full comment

I don't know anything, Mr. Wayne.

Expand full comment

I AGREE WITH YOUR APOLOGY, MR. SOL.

Expand full comment

GO BACK TO THE KITCHEN, SOL. YOU HAVE OVERCOOKED IT TO ALL BURNT UP.

Expand full comment

It's nice, but of all the things I wish Substack would do, this is not in my Top 25

Expand full comment

Not in my top 2,500.

Expand full comment

Yeah, I was trying to be nice

Expand full comment

I would never even cross my mind for Substack to do this - the online gambling grift seems well covered and pervasive.

Expand full comment

Yes and... where are simple tables? Tables, just tables. Why do I have to create these offline and bring them in as goofy images.

Expand full comment

COSIGN

Expand full comment

Mike, Can you be more specific please? Is there some software named “COSIGN” that's useful for adding tables? What am I missing here? I've seen writeups about using Markdown, but most seem to be dated from a few years ago. I wasn't able to make that work. Thank you!

Expand full comment

Jeff, why do you think Substack is heading in this direction?

Expand full comment

I don’t know. I don’t follow the details of Substack enough to understand their strategy. I’m just a writer who wants to use whatever the platform where most readers can view my writing.

Expand full comment

Exactly.... I mean if I have to run away from Corporate Lizards only to be eaten by a thing that first looked like a butterfly which now stings as well.

Expand full comment

Fair enough.

Expand full comment

Like wise me

Expand full comment

To add to my previous comment, we need to normalize making more accurate political predictions.

Expand full comment

No, it's a fantastic addition. Betting markets hold people accountable to their beliefs, and therefore they're more accurate than people's individual predictions.

Expand full comment

This is the first time that I gleefully clicked on a Substack email thinking I was going to gain something sound and wise to enhance my newsletter only to find that I now need to take a shower to wash the oil off.

Expand full comment

THIS

Expand full comment

This was me when the Video Cohort of curated content creators with pre-existing robust social followings were trotted out as the examples we can and should follow.

But yeah, pass the loofah.

Expand full comment

I am so glad that I missed this. Ugh!

Expand full comment

Omg! Yes!

Expand full comment

YES, SOMETIMES, THE GREASE MAKES AN UNWELCOME APPEARANCE.

Expand full comment

This comment will not change anything.

Expand full comment

Sol, if our comments will not change anything, then maybe SS shouldn't be surprised if: 1) they go of business because not making enough revenue that suits them, 2) another SS-like platform comes along that caters truly to 'good writing' (and figures out how to financially do this), or 3) current SS writers get tired of having a great-idea so mismanaged and unappreciated.

Expand full comment

This! Because I might not be heard has never been the thing that kept me from speaking. I’m allergic to apathy.

Expand full comment

Wow, Kimberly, I like this attitude.

Expand full comment

It’s always worth a try 😀 Thank you.

Expand full comment

We shall see.

Expand full comment

That’s the problem with a bunch of writers, they’ll put words together anyway.

Expand full comment

I came to the comments to figure out if I was the only person confused. (I am not)

Expand full comment

So confused. Now that I’m understanding what this is, I am even more confused. WHYYYYYY?

Expand full comment

Same.

Expand full comment

Likewise. I just don't understand this.

Expand full comment

Same

Expand full comment

It's not.

Money follow the incentives.

Expand full comment

I understand Substack's motivation to compete with platforms like beehiiv and X, particularly in attracting higher revenue niches, but I have reservations about introducing prediction market embeds.

This feature risks transforming authentic opinions into market-driven narratives, potentially compromising the integrity that makes Substack valuable. It also seems to disproportionately benefit Polymarket over Substack and its writers.

I'm surprised to see this prioritized when there are likely other features that could more directly benefit the Substack community without introducing potential conflicts of interest. How does Substack plan to ensure this enhances rather than detracts from the platform's core value proposition?

Expand full comment

Yes, for instance what about all the excellent suggestions for improving reader experience with fiction, and serialized fiction especially?

Expand full comment

I could vote for prioritizing THIS feature

Expand full comment

Why would we fritter away our hard earned agency??

Expand full comment

I second the motion.

Expand full comment

Money follow the incentives.

Expand full comment

The enshittification of Substack begins

Expand full comment

Here we go! 🧡

Expand full comment

This can’t be true: such a fancy feature while the plain post editor is still missing basic blogging / long form writing features like variety of fonts, html, pic and text wrapping etc?? Didn’t Substack boast it’s THE place for writers? Wtf?

Expand full comment

They have investors to satisfy, Zoe.

I understand where you are coming from.

I also understand where they are coming from.

Expand full comment

Zoe and Sol, I understand where both of you are coming from. But I must say, I'm more inclined in my gut towards Zoe's feelings. I came to SS almost a year ago with high hopes of starting a site of my own. I'm a writer in the vein of Richardson, Vance, Reich, Snyder, Schmidt -- at the intersection of culture and politics. I'm serious about my writing and don't write from my phone on-the-go (as was introduced to us a few weeks ago as a major new feature). I always compose on my desktop with Word and edit numerous times before I consider my piece finished and ready for publication. Why Word? Simple, it has the most robust digital compositional tools available. Maybe a bit revanche, but sleek and it works! So, I don't understand why SS doesn't try to incorporate a simple copy/paste solution into the editor page. Something elegant and seamless like faultless text WITH embedded images. Believe me I've tried communicating to SS Support -- at the time, couldn't get a support person to tell me whether I could import a Word doc or compose and edit directly onto SS. Still waiting... Finally, Sol to your point, it's very evident SS is throwing everything conceivable onto the wall to determine what will enhance more paid subscriptions. Nothing wrong with that ... except I'd say it doesn't seem as if SS had a well-thought out business/marketing plan at the get-go. I'll just stop now.

Expand full comment

Why don't more women like you get involved in successful business? Then they will know what it's like to be at Substack level.

Why don't you build the next Substack, Jacquelyn?

Expand full comment

Me too...

Expand full comment

This is as far away as possible from the original mission of Substack and its writers community. 😒👎🏽 C'mon, @Hamish. You can do better.

Expand full comment

Totally agree! SS originally promoted itself as a site for good writers.

Expand full comment

Erin, Hamish isn't the only one involved.

Expand full comment

HOW ARE YOU INVOLVED, SOL?

Expand full comment

Not ONE positive comment, Substack devs and staff. Draw your conclusions, this was a glitch of your brains, clean it up please and continue with useful improvements.

Expand full comment

Yeah, I can't figure out SS's executive team's thinking. So maybe throw some more spaghetti at the wall...or, start over and determine your mission statement clearly.

Expand full comment

Isn't prediction markets just a euphemism for online gambling? How does this help the 99% of writers here? Why is Substack prioritizing this over another round of the Substack Go or Substack Grow series?

Expand full comment

I’d pay 1€ to see the minutes of the requirement team meeting where this feature was prioritized and implemented. Technical project manager, come here in disguise and tell us!

Expand full comment

Promoting online gambling? No thanks.

Expand full comment

It’s unethical. And in my birth country is forbidden - one of the few things they get straight.

Expand full comment

That's how the website for Polymarket is set up. I clicked on 'Yes' and was taken to a page that had a $0. So yeah, I had to place a bet if I think USA was going to win. 🤷

Expand full comment

I think this is really going to benefit my literary newsletter.

Expand full comment

Thanks for the chuckle, Daniel.

Expand full comment

😅

Expand full comment

Can't tell if you're serious, Daniel.

Expand full comment

Sol, I think Daniel is being sarcastic. Sounds like something I'd say and definitely think.

Expand full comment

Good to know.

Expand full comment

It seems like glorified gambling to me. Unless I'm missing something.

Expand full comment

That's a way to put it.

Expand full comment

I thought it was some kind of spam.

What a terrible way to announce this feature. For both Substack and polymarket, it looks so cringe.

Most Substack writers won't care at all about this. Next time, target your emails.

Expand full comment

I can't help but think we are moving toward advertisements. I really hope each person has a choice about whether to add this subdtack info. I will definitely be leaving Substack, if not. It is why I no longer use Facebook, X and others like that.

Expand full comment

I have never had interest in SUNROOM SOFA PSYCHOLOGISTS whose goal is to CONTROL. For that reason alone, I see no future for your premise or plot, whichever it is.

Expand full comment

Same

Expand full comment

Substack is here to stay.

Expand full comment

Sol, here to stay until something better comes along for serious writers. Or...until SS decides to come clean about finally admitting they're not getting the revenue they had hoped for. Cynthia, unless more revenue is generated for SS, ads are definitely in the future.

Expand full comment

Writers need to humble themselves.

Expand full comment

sol, your words make me think that THIS SUBSTACK is making you uncomfortable, nervous. or have the need to CHANGE IT INTO SOMETHING ELSE. We must be doing everything correctly, if that is so.

Expand full comment

Sol, you seem to be a thoughtful and intelligent person. Why should we humble ourselves if we feel that we've been deceived? What is your connection to SS that you hold fast so tightly?

Expand full comment

Jacquelyn, because I'm not a thoughtful and intelligent person.

Expand full comment

I'm laughing because~ Humbled folk don't gamble🎲🎰

Expand full comment

Yes, not in the traditional way.

Expand full comment

🤣

Expand full comment

Cringe

Expand full comment

Exactly.

Expand full comment

Oh dear.

Expand full comment